SEARCH DOCUMENTS:
 

Your location: / IETA.home/ News and Information/ News Archive 2007/ March 2007/

Emission traders defend HFC-23 projects, March 3 

Ontario To Explore Joining Forces With U.S. States On Climate Change Initiative, March 30
Australia - Climate change debate warms up in corporate world, March 30
California eyes joining EU emissions trading scheme, March 29
UN Approves First Project Under New Carbon Credit System, March 28
U.S. Senate committee approves first environmental legislation of Congress session, March 28
Baird warns Canadian firms off trading in greenhouse-gas emissions credits, March 23
Effort Afoot to Start US Climate Registry , March 22
USA - Cap and trade gaining favor, March 21
Emissions trading: like foreign aid, but better, March 21
California climate action registry a big draw, March 21
Europe aims to avoid oversupply of CO2 credits at UN, March 20
UN Says System for Tracking Carbon Credits Is Delayed, March 16
EU Parliament sets up Climate Change Committee, March 16
Canada - Dion promises hard caps on greenhouse gasses by 2008, March 16
Make Money and Save The Planet, Carbon Traders Say, March 15
Climate control, March 15
Canada emissions trade seen worth C$12 bln: CIBC, March 14
Britain proposes bold environmental legislation that could pave way for post-Kyoto pact, March 13
Emission traders defend HFC-23 projects, March 3
Canada - Industry seeks flexible greenhouse caps, March 1

Emission traders defend HFC-23 projects, March 3

ENDS
http://www.endseuropedaily.com/227310

The international emission trading association (Ieta) has expressed support for HFC-23 emission reduction projects funded through the Kyoto protocol’s clean development mechanism (CDM). Responding to recent criticisms of CDM industrial gas emission reduction projects (EED 12/02/07), Ieta insists they in fact have been "hugely successful". HFC-23 projects have met the CDM’s primary objective of delivering cost-effective emission cuts, it says, and should not be attacked on the basis of "environmentally irrelevant considerations". Such attacks, it continues, are unfair, undermine investor confidence and contravene international agreements. See position paper.

 

 

 

info@ieta.org | top of page